Features
After years of scouting the globe for new smelter locations, Rio Tinto Alcan’s Dick Evans has turned his attention to the aluminum maker’s home turf and its captive, cost-competitive hydroelectric power. The net result is a $6-billion-plus plan to up output at three Canadian facilities and longing looks of competitors-cum-predators eyeing ways to make the assets their own.
Few subjects stir as much ire among steel consumers as scrap surcharges, the cost pass-along mechanism that has been blamed for a litany of evils, including defanging the one-time tooth-and-nail bargaining between scrap sellers and buyers. Have the mills gone soft? And with scrap prices plummeting, will surcharges linked to prime grades turn the tables on electric-furnace mills?
Surcharges are distinct from steel base prices, which normally aren’t affected by month-to-month scrap price changes, although a rise in steel demand and ferrous scrap prices could put upward pressure on both.
When Vicente Wright officially took over as president and chief executive officer of California Steel Industries Inc. (CSI) on July 1, he could hardly be called a newcomer. Not only had he served as CSI’s chief executive for more than a year in 2003 and 2004, but he played an active role in the set of deals that helped launch the slab converter in 1984 from the rump of the former Kaiser Steel Corp.
The letters stand for public-private partnerships, a new wrinkle in project funding that could pan out big for rod and wire mills waiting for the infrastructure market to finally hit the road.
Road, rail, on the river or deep water, soaring fuel prices, capacity constraints, and runaway freight rates have made moving metal a costly exercise in frustration.